top of page
Writer's pictureDr John H Howard

Innovation for the National Interest: Does Australia Need a National Innovation Council?

John H Howard, 1 October 2024

In an era where innovation drives economic growth and global competitiveness, Australia's fragmented approach to industrial strategy and innovation policy is a serious concern echoed in many forums.


The nation's federal structure, anchored in a written Constitution that divides legislative powers between the Commonwealth and the States, has unintentionally created policy silos. This division hampers the development of cohesive strategies essential for leveraging emerging technologies and industries.

.

The Constitutional Conundrum

Australia's Constitution lacks specific provisions granting the Commonwealth exclusive powers over industrial strategy or innovation policy. Instead, these areas depend on over 20 constitutional sections, including Sections 51 (with multiple subsections), 92, 96, 109, 122, and financial powers under Sections 81 and 83. This intricate legal framework often leads to administrative delays and restricts bold, innovative initiatives.


High Court rulings in 2012 and 2014 further limited the Commonwealth's ability to fund programs without clear constitutional backing. This makes national initiatives like innovation hubs or sector-specific policies challenging to implement.


Furthermore, the Constitution leaves the states with so-called “residual” powers that cover crucial policy levers such as property law, land use zoning and development control, regional development, infrastructure, direct payments for education and health, and environmental management.


This division of powers results in a disconnect between Commonwealth and state policies, leading to inefficiencies, duplicated efforts, and missed opportunities in the innovation ecosystem. The lack of coordination is particularly harmful in emerging sectors that require unified national strategies.


For example, the Commonwealth has developed frameworks like the National Hydrogen Strategy and the Renewable Energy Target (RET) in renewable energy. However, State governments are responsible for implementing energy projects and managing local infrastructure, resulting in a patchwork of policies and uneven progress across the country.


South Australia and New South Wales have set ambitious renewable energy targets and invested heavily in wind, solar, and bioenergy projects. Yet, outdated grid infrastructure managed by the States struggles to integrate these increasingly important energy sources at scale.


Without national coordination and leadership, scaling solutions nationally or presenting a cohesive strategy to investors and global partners becomes challenging. Given these challenges, an Australian Innovation Council becomes a strategic imperative.


The Council would bridge the gap between the Commonwealth and State governments, fostering collaboration and aligning policies across jurisdictions. It would enable the development of unified national strategies that align Federal and State initiatives.

By serving as a platform for collaboration, the Council would streamline efforts, reduce duplication, and ensure efficient resource allocation.


Navigating Constitutional Limitations: Innovation in the National Interest

Operating under the Constitution's implied "nationhood power," the Council can address matters of national interest that transcend constitutional limitations.


The nationhood power has been used to establish the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme, respond to national emergencies, counter-terrorism measures, establish the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, protect the Great Barrier Reef, manage the Murray Darling Basin, and deliver the Gonski reforms for schools funding equity across Australia.


In the context of innovation, this power could provide the Commonwealth with a legal basis to coordinate and implement national strategies that protect and promote Australia's interests in science, technology, and industrial development.


The nationhood power would allow the Commonwealth to initiate and lead innovation policies that require coordination across States and territories. Specifically, it would enable the Commonwealth, through a National Innovation Council, to:

  • Develop and oversee a cohesive national innovation strategy. This Council would coordinate efforts between federal and state governments, academia, and industry to align objectives and efficiently use resources.

  • Design and fund programs that support research and development, commercialising new technologies, and the growth of innovative industries. These programs could address national priorities such as advancing artificial intelligence, quantum computing, renewable energy technologies, and critical minerals processing.

  • Lead national efforts in developing innovative solutions, ensuring Australia is prepared and resilient.


A unified national strategy is vital for enhancing Australia's competitiveness on the global stage. Coordinated efforts in sectors like renewable energy, AI, and quantum technologies would enable the country to attract investment, foster innovation, and establish itself as a leader in these fields.


By presenting a cohesive policy environment, Australia could offer the stability and clarity that international investors seek. This would significantly improve the nation's appeal as a destination for global partnerships and investments in cutting-edge industries.


Addressing Critical Sector Challenges

In renewable energy, the Council could coordinate the modernisation of grid infrastructure to integrate renewable sources nationwide effectively. Harmonising state and federal renewable energy targets and incentives would create a cohesive national approach, facilitating the scaling of solutions and attracting investment.


For critical minerals, a national strategy developed by the Council would optimise resource allocation, avoid interstate competition, and enhance efficiency. This unified approach would position Australia as a leading supplier in the global market, maximising the economic benefits of its vast mineral reserves.


In emerging technologies like AI, robotics, and quantum computing, the Council could scale resources and expertise to establish national centres of excellence. This consolidation would prevent fragmented efforts and promote standardised regulations and ethical guidelines, fostering innovation while ensuring societal safeguards.


This strategic focus is essential for driving economic growth and ensuring that Australia remains at the forefront of technological advancement. It would also encourage a culture of innovation that permeates all levels of government and industry.


One Australia: Promoting National Identity, Inclusivity and Avoiding Regional Disparities

A unified national vision for innovation would enhance economic prospects and strengthen national identity and purpose. By establishing common goals and narratives, the Council could inspire collective effort and national pride in Australia's innovation capabilities.


Coordinated action on pressing issues like climate change, health crises, and economic transitions would address national challenges more effectively. This unified approach would reinforce Australia's position as a proactive and forward-thinking nation.


The Council would ensure equitable development by facilitating sharing best practices and successful strategies between States. This inclusivity would prevent regional disparities and ensure that all States benefit from national initiatives, regardless of their individual capacities or focus areas.


The Council would promote collaboration over competition, creating a more cohesive and resilient national economy. It would also help identify and nurture talent and innovation across all regions.


Conclusion

The rapidly evolving science, technology, and innovation landscape demands a cohesive national response.


Establishing an Australian National Innovation Council is necessary to bridge systemic gaps caused by constitutional divisions and federal fragmentation.


The Council could develop and implement unified strategies that enhance Australia's innovation ecosystem by fostering collaboration between the Commonwealth and State governments. In a world where disruptive technologies are reshaping economies, Australia's ability to coordinate its innovation efforts will determine its future prosperity and competitiveness.


The National Innovation Council would represent a bold step towards embracing this future, ensuring that the nation not only keeps pace with global advancements but leads the way in shaping them. It's time for Australia to consolidate its strengths and present a united front in the global innovation arena.


This summary draws on a more comprehensive project available for comment and discussion through the link below.



146 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page